ETL402 – Module One

Children’s Literature

Well I have finally started the reading for this unit, and despite my protests and phobia of long readings it wasn’t as nearly as difficult as I thought.

So my ideas…

Up front this unit asks you to consider what is a child and childhood and therefore what is children’s literature? I think that in terms of a generally acknowledged definition and one that is easy to understand saying that a child is anyone zero to eighteen years old seems pretty satisfactory. I guess the problem with that is though that there are many different capabilities and levels within that broad range. An eighteen year old is not necessarily going to be thinking or acting like a five year old. This has ramifications when one tries to define children’s literature. One thing that really stood out for me is that everyone, and children specifically, should be “reading literature according to their physical and intellectual capacities” (Winch, 2006, p.399).

So what then is children’s literature? I think that it is anything written or created for ‘children’. It would deal with issues that engage and concern the 0-18 year-old’s. just like adult literature it is broken up into genres, but rather than just going by theme so to speak, it is also broken up according to those physical and intellectual capabilities. So not only do you have romance, but you also have tween, teen, pre-school etc. And even though it may be divided this ageist way, it doesn’t mean you cannot read outside your age group to suit your capabilities and needs.

This debate reminds me of some trouble I have been having with manga. Each series is given a rating but I find those rated ‘older teen’ are actually more suited to adults. It is interesting to see what is acceptable to the Japanese compared to what I think is acceptable for a high school full of Catholic girls in Australia.

I was also struck by an issue raised in two of the readings to do with an article by Zipes (2009). The question is raised of whether new technology is ‘dulling children’s senses’ and whether images are going to be more important than words. Zipes seems to think that this is a massive problem, but is it really? If children are becoming more digitised why shouldn’t the literature they read reflect and engage them through the media they like. Again it comes back to the manga/graphic novel thing. I cannot buy enough of these for the school library, students will read them over and over and even out of order because they like the style and format. This doesn’t mean I have stopped buying traditional novels, it has just led to more borrowing and reading – a good thing I think.